Tag: CBI probe

  • YS Viveka murder: Suspense continues on CBI probe as deadline ends today

    The deadline for the CBI’s investigation into the former minister YS Vivekananda Reddy’s murder case is ending today. However, there is suspense over the decision that the CBI will take regarding the investigation.

    It is unclear whether the investigation has been concluded or if there will be an extension to the deadline.

    In addition, the Supreme Court will hear a petition filed by Viveka’s daughter Sunitha seeking the cancellation of the anticipatory bail of MP Avinash Reddy (YS Avinash Reddy), who is an accused in the case on July 3.

    The CBI is expected to file a charge sheet soon against accused Bhaskar Reddy and another accused and explain the progress of the investigation to the Supreme Court on July 3. It is likely that CBI would request an extension for the investigation.

  • DA case against DKS: HC extends interim stay against CBI probe

    DA case against DKS: HC extends interim stay against CBI probe

    The petition filed by Deputy Chief Minister D K Shivakumar in the disproportionate assets case has been referred to the Chief Justice for posting it before the appropriate bench. Meanwhile, Justice M Nagaprasanna also extended the interim order of stay in the matter.

    The CBI had registered a case against Shivakumar and his family members alleging disproportionate assets. The FIR stated that during the check period between April 1, 2013 and April 30, 2018, Shivakumar and his family members were in possession of Rs 74.93 crore disproportionate assets, which has not been explained with proper documents.

    In his petition, Shivakumar had stated that the CBI was causing mental stress by issuing repeated notices. It was also submitted that along with Shivakumar, his wife and daughter were also served with notices by the investigating agency. According to the petitioner, the CBI could not have initiated coercive measures against him in view of the earlier order of the high court.

    The matter was listed before the bench presided over by Justice Nagaprasanna, who is the designated judge at the high court for cases arising from Special Court for public representatives (MPs/MLAs). It was submitted before the court that the matter was marked as part-heard as it was extensively heard before the previous judge (Justice K Natarajan).

    Meanwhile, P Prasanna Kumar, special counsel for the CBI, submitted that the agency had filed an interlocutory application for vacating the stay on investigation granted on February 10, 2023. He further stated that the previous designated judge had expressed that the matter should go before the appropriate bench as the roster has been changed.

    However, on perusal of the earlier orders passed in the case, Justice Nagaprasanna said that it is expressly indicated that the matter was part-heard. The court said that the previous judge may have observed that the matter should be listed before the roster bench, but there is no order releasing the matter from the part-heard category. The court directed the registry to take necessary steps to place it before the Chief Justice for appropriate orders.

  • Karnataka HC rejects DK Shivakumar’s plea against CBI probe

    Karnataka HC rejects DK Shivakumar’s plea against CBI probe

    BENGALURU: The High Court of Karnataka on Thursday upheld the sanction granted by the state government to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to probe the alleged corruption charges against KPCC president DK Shivakumar.

    Justice K Natarajan passed the order while dismissing a petition filed by Shivakumar in 2020, questioning the permission given by the state government to the CBI to conduct a probe against him. The case involves inter-state investigation and huge benami transactions.

    The state government gave sanction to the CBI on September 25, 2019, to probe the case under Section 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act as the assets of the accused are outside Karnataka.

    The CBI contended that the accused has no right to choose or say which investigating agency should investigate him and consent under Section 6 of the Act does not require reasons to be passed while granting sanction.